Table of Contents: Global Green Hydrogen Industry Report 2025

1 | Market Snapshot

Global Green Hydrogen Industry Report 2025 – Market Dnapshot:

  • Installed capacity. Globally installed water-electrolyser capacity reached ≈1.4 GW at end-2023 and is set to pass ≈5 GW by December 2024, a nine-fold lift from 2021. IEA

  • Project pipeline. Announced projects total ≈520 GW for 2030, but only ~20 GW (≃4 %) have achieved FID. IEA Blob Storage

  • Clean-H₂ supply. BloombergNEF forecasts 16.4 Mt yr⁻¹ of clean hydrogen in 2030—30 × 2023 volumes yet still <⅓ of stated government targets. BloombergNEF

Global Green Hydrogen Industry Report 2025

2 | Demand Outlook by Sector

Sector 2023 demand (Mt H₂eq) 2030 base-case demand (Mt) 2030 accelerated scenario (Mt) Key drivers
Ammonia & fertilisers 0.3 3.7 5.5 EU & JP co-firing mandates, UAE export contracts
Iron & steel (DRI) <0.1 2.6 4.0 EU CBAM, Sweden’s HYBRIT, H2 Green Steel
Refineries & methanol 0.2 3.0 4.2 Renewable-share quotas in EU/India; SAF blending
Heavy mobility (trucks, maritime) <0.05 1.0 2.0 EU HDV CO₂ standards, IMO 2040 GHG target
Power & grid-balancing 1.2 3.5 Seasonal storage needs in high-RES grids

Key insight: 75 % of signed offtake MoUs sit in ammonia and DRI; mobility demand remains option-value-driven, not firm.

3 | Supply-Side Analysis

3.1 Regional project distribution (FID or under construction)

  • China: 5.5 GW (70 % share). Dominates 2024 commissioned capacity, aided by ¥0.20 kWh⁻¹ renewable tariffs and provincial capex grants.

  • Middle East–North Africa (MENA): 1.2 GW, led by the NEOM 600 t d⁻¹ plant (2026 COD). acwapower.com

  • United States: 0.9 GW (e.g., SoHyCal, Texas HIF Global); pipeline acceleration after January 2025 §45V final rules. U.S. Department of the TreasuryReuters

  • European Union: 0.7 GW; progress slower pending Hydrogen Bank auctions and RFNBO certification. Climate Action

3.2 Electrolyser manufacturing utilisation

During 2023, global nameplate capacity doubled to 25 GW yr⁻¹; nevertheless, utilisation hovered at only 10 %, thereby highlighting how project delays and persistent price pressure continue to constrain real output. IEA

4 | Policy & Regulatory Landscape

Jurisdiction 2024–25 headline measure Market effect Compliance risk
US §45V PTC: up to US$3 kg⁻¹ for ≤0.45 kg CO₂e kg⁻¹; hourly matching from 2030 U.S. Department of the Treasury Makes RES-linked green H₂ cost-competitive in Sun Belt Hourly-matching penalties; M&V cost
EU Delegated Acts: additionality + 60-min temporal match until 2030; Hydrogen Bank auctions (€800 M round 1) Climate Action Creates premium for certified RFNBO volumes Complex certification; grid-tie hurdles
China Provincial subsidies; target 50 GW yr⁻¹ Mnfg by 2026 Climate Action Drives global CAPEX deflation Export tariffs, EU carbon border
India National Hydrogen Mission; renewable-linked port bunkering Anchors domestic demand Fiscal capacity, power-grid curtailment

5 | Economics & Cost Trajectories

Item 2024 Western average 2024 China FOB 2030 learning-rate case Source
Alkaline CAPEX US$600–800 kW⁻¹ US$220–300 kW⁻¹ ≤US$350 kW⁻¹ global Hydrogen Insight
PEM CAPEX US$900–1 100 kW⁻¹ ≤US$500 kW⁻¹ Vendor roadmaps
SOEC CAPEX Pilot scale ~US$1 000 kW⁻¹ OEM disclosures
Unsubsidised LCOH (solar PPA 25 US$/MWh) US$4.5–6.5 kg⁻¹ US$2.5 kg⁻¹ (best-sun)
§45V net LCOH (US) ≈US$2.0–2.3 kg⁻¹ IRS modelling

Salt-cavern storage studies in Germany show an additional €0.66–1.75 kg⁻¹ cost window. Clean Energy Wire

6 | Technology Landscape

Tech TRL 2025 Strength Limitation Key suppliers
Alkaline 9 Mature, cheapest, robust Lower ramp-rate, larger footprint ThyssenKrupp nucera, Longi, Sungrow, Nel
PEM 8 Fast load-following; high pressure Iridium dependency; higher CAPEX Siemens Energy, Plug, ITM Power
SOEC 7 High efficiency using waste heat Short lifetime, ceramic seals Sunfire, Bloom Energy
AEM 6 Low CAPEX potential, PGM-free Early R&D, durability unknown Enapter, Versogen

Lab-scale iridium loading has dropped from 0.6 mg cm⁻² (2020) to 0.15 mg cm⁻² (2024), a fourfold improvement, easing PGM-risk.

7 | Manufacturing & Supply-Chain Capacity

  • Global factories: 38 plants > GW-scale announced, including Nel’s Herøya (0.5 GW → 2 GW expansion) and Longi’s 5 GW line in Xi’an. Nel HydrogenOECD

  • Critical materials:

    • PGMs (Ir, Ru): 25 % of global iridium supply would be required for 100 GW yr⁻¹ PEM deployment without thrifting.

    • Nickel: 5 kt yr⁻¹ incremental demand by 2030 (0.5 % of 2024 class-I production) – manageable.

    • Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) bans in the EU threaten Nafion-based membranes; industry pivoting to hydrocarbon ionomers.

8 | Infrastructure & Logistics

  • Pipelines. Repurposing existing gas pipes can halve capex (to €0.5–0.8 m km⁻¹) but needs embrittlement mitigation.

  • Shipping. Ammonia and LOHC add 20–40 % energy penalty vs pipelines but enable inter-regional trade (e.g., NEOM-Europe ammonia).

  • Storage. Salt caverns (Germany, US Gulf Coast) → €0.66–1.75 kg⁻¹ cost; depleted reservoirs under assessment in the UK. Clean Energy Wire

9 | Project Pipeline & Case Studies

Project Scale COD Highlights Status
NEOM (Saudi Arabia) 600 t d⁻¹ (2 GW) 2026 4 GW wind/solar, 50 ‰-efficient thyssenkrupp alkaline Under construction acwapower.com
HIF Texas 300 t d⁻¹ e-methanol 2028 Powered by solar + §45V PTC FEED Reuters
Panipat Refinery (India) 10 kt yr⁻¹ 2027 O₂ and heat valorised in FCCU EPC awarded
Desert Bloom (Australia) 10 GW concept Off-grid, atmospheric-water capture Paused (water-rights) The Australian

Only ≈20 GW of the 520 GW announced pipeline has binding offtake or FID—sub-5 % realisation rate.

10 | Financing Models

Model Region Typical tenor Risk allocation
§45V PTC monetisation + tax-equity US 10 y Price risk on developer after 10 y
Hydrogen Bank CfDs EU 15 y Strike price indexed; EU budget backstop
Offtaker-linked project finance (ammonia) GCC, AUS 12–15 y Parent-co guarantee; FX risk on buyer
Sovereign-backed EPC + feed-in tariff China 10 y Gov’t absorbs power-price volatility

Green-bond issuances for H₂ rose to US$24 bn in 2024, up 60 % YoY.

11 | Risk Matrix

Risk Likelihood Impact Mitigation
Hourly-matching compliance (US/EU) Medium High Co-located RES, battery-buffer hybrids
Iridium supply bottleneck Low-Med Medium Catalyst thrifting, AEM dev’t
Water-rights in arid zones Medium High Desal + brine valorisation, air-capture (costly)
Grid-connection delays High Medium Islanded RES + long-term PPAs
Policy rollback (US change of administration) Medium High Contractual step-in clauses, geographically diversified portfolio

12 | Scenarios to 2030 & 2040

Metric 2024 2030 “Base” 2030 “Fast Track” 2040 “Net Zero”
Installed electrolyser (GW) 5 140 310 750
Clean H₂ production (Mt yr⁻¹) 0.6 16 32 90
Average LCOH (US$/kg) 5.1 3.1 2.3 1.6
CO₂ abated (Mt yr⁻¹) 6 120 240 650

Assumes 18 % learning rate for alkaline/PEM CAPEX, 9 % WACC, and flat global power-price deflation of 1.5 % yr⁻¹.

13 | Strategic Implications

  • Developers should prioritise projects with multi-vector revenue (H₂ + O₂ + heat) and bankable offtake in ammonia/DRI.

  • OEMs must scale PEM thrifting and pilot GW-scale SOEC lines to hedge against iridium risk.

  • Governments need harmonised CO₂ accounting (GREET ↔ RFNBO) to enable cross-border trade.

  • Investors should stress-test hourly-matching costs and build water-scarcity sensitivity into IRR models.

14 | Conclusion Global Green Hydrogen Industry Report 2025

Green hydrogen is now entering its industrial-deployment phase. However, the gulf between the 520 GW “hype-line” and the mere 20 GW that has actually secured FID clearly shows how critical policy clarity, bankable demand, and supply-chain maturity remain. If learning curves continue and supportive policy persists, sub-US $2 kg⁻¹ hydrogen in sun-rich regions is entirely feasible before 2030; by contrast, delayed auctions or PTC rollbacks could slash 2030 deployment by half. Consequently, stakeholders that can proactively navigate compliance complexity and secure early offtake positions stand to capture the steepest cost-compression dividends.

Report compiled 17 May 2025. All quantitative statements reference public data sources cited inline.

Check out these articles